Lame duck president and supreme8/14/2023 ![]() ![]() "Certainly not a norm or tradition by presidents refraining from nominating in a presidential election year or by senators refusing to consider such nominations." "This is entirely a matter of circumstance," Sarah Binder, a George Washington University political scientist, told us in February. Instead, it’s because it’s simply rare for this combination of circumstances to occur. There is a long tradition that you don't do this in an election year."Īs PolitiFact reported at the time, that’s largely true - but not because of "tradition" (Cruz’s words) or "bipartisan practice" (Horn’s words). There, he told host Chuck Todd that ""It has been 80 years since a Supreme Court vacancy was nominated and confirmed in an election year. It turns out that an almost identical statement was made by presidential candidate and Texas Sen. Senate found themselves in this situation. We were struck by Horn’s assertion that more than eight decades had passed since a president and U.S. ![]() This is simply not the time to break with decades of bipartisan practice." "For more than eighty years, there has not been a nomination and confirmation of a Supreme Court Justice in a presidential election year. "Republicans have repeatedly stated that the American people deserve a voice in the process of selecting the next Supreme Court Justice, and I wholeheartedly agree," Horn wrote. State Republican chairwoman Jennifer Horn echoed Ayotte’s sentiment and issued a statement criticizing Obama’s move. Senator Kelly Ayotte says the next president should select a justice instead. The ongoing partisan feud over President Obama’s Supreme Court nomination Merrick Garland made its way to New Hampshire, where U.S. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |